Last week the Supreme Court refused to grant certiorari to the case of Khaled el-Masri, who asserts the United States government tortured him while in Afghanistan. He claims that he was detained in 2003 while in Macedonia and later transported to Afghanistan to be tortured. His case would have presented two issues to the Supreme Court. If Mr. Masri had been taken to Afghanistan to be tortured, his case would affirm the United States' use of extraordinary rendition. Several international conventions prohibit the use of extraordinary rendition, or the movement of a person from one state to another, typically one that permits the use of torture. Among these is the United Nations Convention against Torture, which the United States ratified in 1994.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
The Supreme Court Refuses to Weigh National Security against Liberty
Posted by
On the Docket: The Supreme Court Society of Georgetown University
at
12:16 PM
0
comments
Labels: international law, terrorism, torture
Saturday, October 6, 2007
Congress Investigates CIA Toruture Policy by Seizure of Justice Department Documents
Congress seized Justice Department documents in order to discover whether the President has authorized torture techniques banned by the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005. Since memorandums exposed by the New York Times first alerted Congress to this issue, the Democratically-controlled legislature has pressured the Justice Department to more readily disclose documents. The situation begs the question as to whether the executive branch has taken the opportunity to disrupt the balance of power with the unique situation the War on Terror has presented to the government.
For more information about the issue, the New York Times article can be found here.
Posted by
On the Docket: The Supreme Court Society of Georgetown University
at
9:46 PM
0
comments